Keywords
administrative burden
instructional efficiency
middle schools
teacher perceptions
How to Cite
Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in reducing administrative burdens and enhancing instructional efficiency in middle schools. Using a systematic literature review with bibliometric analysis (SLRBA), the study analysed data from databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and JSTOR. It highlights AI's ability to automate tasks, provide real-time feedback, and generate reports, allowing teachers to focus on instructional activities and improving teaching quality and student outcomes. Ethical considerations were also addressed, including privacy, confidentiality, and copyright compliance. The findings reveal that AI tools significantly save time for teachers, enhancing instructional efficiency. While teachers view AI as beneficial, concerns about its accuracy, potential impact on teacher roles, and ethical issues like data privacy remain significant. Human oversight and comprehensive teacher training are deemed essential for successful AI integration. In conclusion, while AI tools offer transformative potential, addressing ethical concerns and optimizing teacher preparedness is critical for maximizing their benefits. Future research should investigate AI's long-term impact, broaden demographic inclusion, and explore strategies for effective implementation to leverage its capabilities fully in middle school education.
References
Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
Anisman, H., & Kusnecov, A. W. (2022). Adopting healthy behaviors: Toward prevention and cures. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 369–400). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-91904-3.00019-7
Awad, N. (2020). Incorporating Pre-Service teachers and middle school students in learning advanced integrative STEM programs. Creative Education, 11(04), 605–615. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.114045
Ayala-Pazmiño, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence in Education: Exploring the potential benefits and risks. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 8(3), 892–899. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2023.3.1827
Bosnjak, M., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352–356. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107
Boston, M. (2012). Assessing instructional quality in mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 76–104. https://doi.org/10.1086/666387
Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K-12: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7
Caspari-Sadeghi, S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Technology-Enhanced Assessment: A Survey of Machine Learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(3), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221138791
Caucheteux, C., Hodgkins, L., Batifol, V., Fouché, L., & Romero, M. (2024). Students’ perspective on the use of artificial intelligence in education. In Creative Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education (1st ed., pp. 101–113). Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55272-4_8
Chen, F., & Abdullah, R. B. (2022). Teacher Cognition and Practice of Educational equity in English as a Foreign language teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820042
Djokic, I., Milicevic, N., Djokic, N., Malcic, B., & Kalas, B. (2024). Students perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence in educational service. Amfiteatru Economic, 26(65), 294. https://doi.org/10.24818/ea/2024/65/294
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Fong, M., Dodson, S., Harandi, N. M., Seo, K., Yoon, D., Roll, I., & Fels, S. (2019). Instructors desire student activity, literacy, and video quality analytics to improve video-based blended courses. In Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 1–10).
García-Martínez, I., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & León, S. P. (2023). Analysing the Impact of artificial intelligence and computational sciences on student performance: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1240
Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. (2023). Exploring the impact of AI on teacher leadership: regressing or expanding? Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8415–8433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12174-w
Godwin, K. E., Seltman, H., Almeda, M., Skerbetz, M. D., Kai, S., Baker, R. S., & Fisher, A. V. (2021). The elusive relationship between time on-task and learning: not simply an issue of measurement. Educational Psychology, 41(4), 502–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1894324
Goel, A. K., & Polepeddi, L. (2016). Jill Watson: A virtual teaching assistant for online education. Georgia Institute of Technology.
Göksoy, S., & Akdağ, Ş. K. (2014). Primary and secondary school teachers’ perceptions of workload. Creative Education, 05(11), 877–885. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.511101
Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) Model: a Critical Review and Suggestions for its Use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
Holstein, K., Hong, G., Tegene, M., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2018). The classroom as a dashboard: Co-designing wearable cognitive augmentation for K-12 teachers. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 79–88).
Johnston, H., Wells, R.F., Shanks, E.M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4
Kamalov, F., Calonge, D. S., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New era of Artificial intelligence in Education: Towards a sustainable Multifaceted Revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), 12451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451
Kim, K. (2019). Teachers’ administrative workload crowding out instructional activities. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1572592
Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teacher’s perceptions of using an Artificial Intelligence-Based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
Kitchenham, B. A., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Niazi, M. K., Linkman, S., Pretorius, R., & Budgen, D. (2010). Refining the systematic literature review process—two participant-observer case studies. Empirical Software Engineering, 15(6), 618–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9134-8
Koehler, M. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29544/.
Leon Furze. (2024, March 21). Artificial intelligence and teacher workload: Can AI actually save educators time? https://leonfurze.com/2024/03/21/artificial-intelligence-and-teacher-workload-can-ai-actually-save-educators-time/comment-page-1/
Lester, F. K. (2005). On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education. ZDM. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik. 37(6), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02655854
Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Extending Technology Acceptance Model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8
Loureiro, S. M. C., Bilro, R. G., & Neto, D. (2022). Working with AI: can stress bring happiness? Service Business, 17(1), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-022-00514-8.
Majorana, C. D. B., Gonçalves, R. B., Neto, F. L. A., & Camargo, R. Z. (2022). Enhancing Administrative Efficiency in Higher Education with AI: A Chatbot Solution. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3, e023. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v3i00.23
Martínez-Comesaña, M., Rigueira-Díaz, X., Larrañaga-Janeiro, A., Martínez-Torres, J., Ocarranza-Prado, I., & Kreibel, D. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on assessment methods in primary and secondary education: Systematic literature review. Revista De Psicodidáctica, 28(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2023.06.002
Nguyen, A., Kremantzis, M., Essien, A., Petrounias, I., & Hosseini, S. (2024). Editorial: Enhancing Student Engagement Through Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the basics, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 21(06). https://doi.org/10.53761/caraaq92
Okagbue, E. F., Ezeachikulo, U. P., Akintunde, T. Y., Tsakuwa, M. B., Ilokanulo, S. N., Obiasoanya, K. M., Ilodibe, C. E., & Ouattara, C. a. T. (2023). A comprehensive overview of artificial intelligence and machine learning in education pedagogy: 21 Years (2000–2021) of research indexed in the scopus database. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100655
Owan, V. J., Abang, K. B., Idika, D. O., Etta, E. O., & Bassey, B. A. (2023). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2307. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13428
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Roll, I., Russell, D. M., & Gašević, D. (2018). Learning at scale. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(4), 471–477.
Rosário, A. T., Moniz, L. B., & Cruz, R. (2021). Data Science Applied to Marketing: A Literature Review. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 37(5), 1067–1081. https://doi.org/10.6688/jise.202109_37(5).0006
Sangheethaa S, & Arun Korath. (2024). Impact Of AI In Education Through A Teachers Perceptive. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(4), 3196–3200. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.1349
Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., Vartiainen, H., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2023). Developing middle school students’ understanding of machine learning in an African school. Computers and Education. Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100155
Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9
Slagg, A. (2023, November 14). AI for Teachers: Defeating Burnout and Boosting Productivity. Technology Solutions That Drive Education. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2023/11/ai-for-teachers-defeating-burnout-boosting-productivity-perfcon
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). AI literacy curriculum and its relation to children’s perceptions of robots and attitudes towards engineering and science: An intervention study in early childhood education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12867
Su, P., & Wang, Y. (2023). A survey on the current situation of teacher motivation in public junior middle schools in Western China. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(01), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.111004
Tapalova, O., & Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education: AIED for Personalised Learning Pathways. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(5), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.5.2597
Uygun, D. (2024). Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence in education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(1), 931-939. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.005
Vendramin, N., Nardelli, G., & Ipsen, C. (2021). Task-Technology fit theory. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 39–53). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003128830-4
Venkatesh, N., Morris, N., Davis, N., & Davis, N. (2003). User acceptance of information Technology: toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wang, L. (2023). A Review of the Application of Process Evaluation in Junior High School English Teaching under “Double Reduction.” Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(10), 1681–1688. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2023.1310132
Wang, X., Li, X., & Huang, J. (2023). Junior High School Artificial Intelligence Literacy: Connotation, evaluation and Promotion Strategy. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(05), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.115004
Yim, I. H. Y., & Su, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) learning tools in K-12 education: A scoping review. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00304-9
Zare, P., Pettit, C., Leao, S., & Gudes, O. (2022). Digital Bicycling Planning: A Systematic Literature Review of Data-Driven Approaches. Sustainability, 14(23), 16319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316319
Zhou, L., Xue, S., & Li, R. (2022). Extending the technology acceptance model to explore students’ intention to use an online education platform at a university in China. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402210852. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221085259
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sravan Nemani