Keywords
Google Bard
large language models
artificial intelligence
generative AI
How to Cite
Abstract
The last century can be considered the era of technology. There are always new technologies blooming. The time span between the developments of technology shortened. The acceptance and adoption of each new technology can be different. However, the technology acceptance model (TAM) and diffusion of innovation theory (DOI) propose that there are some patterns for usage of any new technologies. Meanwhile, there is tremendous interest on artificial intelligence (AI) technologies after the ChatGPT trend. Thus, the purpose of is study is to explore the most current literature review of the acceptance and adoption of ChatGPT and Google Bard type Large Language Models (LLM) and generative AI by educational settings. The study used literature review methodology. The review was a systematic perspective which going through the study on acceptance and adoption of some popular technology in education settings in the current days. The review of the literature shows that there is an acceptance of the models in education but with doubts.
References
Ahn S. (2023). The impending impacts of large language models on medical education. Korean J Med Educ, 35(1),103-107. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2023.253
AlAfnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). ChatGPT as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0184
Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers' attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.013
Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., Al-Emran, M. (2021). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Social Media in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model. In: Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K., Hassanien, A. (eds) Recent Advances in Intelligent Systems and Smart Applications. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 295, 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_31
Ayanwale, M. (2023). Can Experience Determine the Adoption of Industrial Revolution 4.0 Skills in 21st Century Mathematics Education?. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(1), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2023.6
Aydın, Ö. (2023). Google Bard Generated Literature Review. Metaverse, SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4454615
Baytak, A., & Hirca, N. (2013). Prospective teachers’ lived experience on computer-based instructional materials: A phenomenological study. Anthropologist, 16(1-2), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2013.11891339
Castillo-González, W. (2023). The importance of human supervision in the use of ChatGPT as a support tool in scientific writing. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research, 2, 29-29. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202329
Clark, R. E. (1994). Media Will Never Influence Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299088
Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology since 1920. Teachers College Press.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Duarte F. (2023). Number of ChatGPT Users. Exploding Topics. May 16, 2023 https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Fuchs, K. (2023, May). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: is Chat GPT a blessing or a curse?. In Frontiers in Education, 8, 1166682. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166682
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P. & Kyriakidou, O. (2004), Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82, 581-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
Grine, F. E. Fleagle, J. G., & Leakey, R. E. (2009). The First Humans: Origin and Early Evolution of the Genus Homo. Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9980-9
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
Hirschbuhl, J. J., & Goolsby, T. W. (1994). Multimedia in the Classroom: A Study of Technology Acceptance and Utilization. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(4), 565-579.
Ivanov, S., & Soliman, M. (2023). Game of algorithms: ChatGPT implications for the future of tourism education and research. Journal of Tourism Futures, 9(2), 214-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-02-2023-0038
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
Kahlon, K., Iyyer, M., & Boyd-Graber, J. (2021). Nudging students with language models improves response quality in asynchronous online discussions. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 1-14).
Kasneci, E. Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, G., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T. Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J. Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, T., Kuhn, J., Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
King, M.R. (2023). ChatGPT. A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education. Cel. Mol. Bioeng 16, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8
Koraishi, O. (2023). Teaching English in the Age of AI: Embracing ChatGPT to Optimize EFL Materials and Assessment. Language Education & Technology (LET Journal), 3(1), 55-72.
Laumer, S. & Eckhardt, A. (2010). Why do people reject technologies? – Towards a unified model of resistance to it-induced organizational change. DIGIT 2010 Proceedings, 14.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/digit2010/14
Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008). Teacher factors influencing classroom ICT integration: A three-levels analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 235-254. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.3.a
Liao, Y., Desmarais, M. C., & Chai, J. Y. (2021). The impact of a language model on student engagement and learning. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, (pp. 554-561).
Lo C. K. (2023). What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Lund, B. D. and Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?. Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
Mark, nd. (2023). Google Bard Statistics & facts [June 2023]. Ml Yearning https://www.mlyearning.org/google-bard-statistics-facts/ June 1, 2023
McKenna, M. C., Labbo, L. D., Reinking, D., & Zucker, T. A. (2003). Effective uses of technology in literacy instruction. Best practices in literacy instruction, 2, 307-331.
Mearian, L. (2023). What are LLMs, and how are they used in generative AI? Computerworld, May 30, 2023, https://www.computerworld.com/article/3697649/what-are-large-language-models-and-how-are-they-used-in-generative-ai.html
Milano, S., McGrane, J.A. & Leonelli, S. (2023). Large language models challenge the future of higher education. Nat Mach Intell 5, 333–334 https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00644-2
Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., Graham, C. R., & Moskal, P. D. (Eds.). (2021). Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, V3. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037736
Raman, R., Mandal, S., Das, P., Kaur, T., Sanjanasri, J. P., & Nedungadi, P. (2023). University students as early adopters of ChatGPT: Innovation Diffusion Study. 27 March 2023, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2734142/v1
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.
Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’ theory. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET 5(2), 14-23.
Sallam, M. (2023) ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887-898. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887
Sallam, M., Salim, N., Barakat, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Tammemi, A. B., Malaeb, D., Hallit, R., Hallit, S. (2023). Validation of a technology acceptance model-based scale TAME-ChatGPT on health students attitudes and usage of ChatGPT in Jordan. JMIR Preprints. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.48254
Salomon, G. (1981). Communication and Education: Social and Psychological Interactions. Jossey-Bass.
Shahsavar, Y., & Choudhury, A. (2023). User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study. JMIR Human Factors, 10(1), e47564. https://doi.org/10.2196/47564
Stieglitz, S., Mirza, P., & Laumer, S. (2021). What chatbots can do for education: A review of chatbot applications in learning and teaching. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-33.
Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
Suppes, P. (1966). The uses of computers in education. Scientific American, 215(3), 206-223.
Thorp H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379, 313-313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
Trust, T., Whalen, J., & Mouza, C. (2023). Editorial: ChatGPT: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications for Teacher Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 1-23. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/222408/
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Wang, Y., McKee, M., Torbica, A., & Stuckler, D. (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social science & medicine, 240, 112552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810210400308
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmet Baytak